READ THIS FIRST:

  1. This article was originally published in the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religions, 1979: 18 (3): 243-251)
  2. This document is re-published in the hope that it will be useful, but not necessarily the maintainer of this site agree with the ideas contained in the document.

Deviant Religion and Cultural Evolution: The Aymara Case

by TED C. LEWELLEN
Abstract: The role that "deviant" religions can play in the processes of cultural evolution has been largely overlooked by anthropologists. Among the Aymara Indians of Peru, a once ostracized and persecuted group of seventh Day Adventists has assumed leadership as the community system is transformed from a subsistence agriculture economy to a money economy. To explain this emergence of a Protestant elite in a predominantly Catholic society, a "Weberian" hypothesis, based on a causal relation between Protestantism and capitalism, is tested and rejected. An alternative hypothesis, based on the adaptive value of deviance in the evolutionary process proves more in accord with the data. It is shown that deviant religion, while not a primary cause of cultural evolution, may be a powerful directive force.

A basic principle of biological evolution is that genetic variation is an essential precondition to adaptive change; a group of organisms "must have the materials for such changes, not only in the sense of established structural norms but also and more particularly in the sense of variations from those norms, of the potentiality for changes in them in order to adapt them to meet new opportunities or necessities" (Simpson, 1949: 146). The extension of this principle of variation from biological change to cultural change may be no more than strained analogy, or it may be, as a general systems theorist might maintain, actual homology, (e.g., Ashby, 1968; Buckley, 1968: 495). In any case, such a principle is explicitly recognized in some theories of sociocultural evolution (e.g., Boehm, 1978); social systems require variation, or deviance, to adapt to environmental changes. Although Max Weber's classic correlation between Protestantism and industrialization is certainly suggestive, the role of religious deviation in the processes of cultural evolution has been virtually ignored by anthropologists.

One need not seek far for the reasons for such indifference. As long as synchronic functionalist and structuralist paradigms dominated anthropology, deviance of any kind was viewed as dysfunctional to a social system's equilibrium. Conflict theorists, such as Max Gluckman (1956), emphasized deviation but only to the purpose of demonstrating how it was ultimately stabilizing. Even cultural evolutionists sometimes seemed oblivious to the adaptive value of deviance; neither Leslie White (1959) nor Julian Steward (1955) treat directly this principle in their major works on cultural evolution. Nor would we expect much attention to religious deviance in any case, since theories of cultural evolution have tended to be strongly materialist, focusing on transformations of energy and on technoenvironmental determinants. Ideology has been secondary, often tertiary (after social structure) in such theories.

Particular ethnographic studies have ignored the role of religious deviation in cultural evolution for several reasons. First, most of the changes observed directly by anthropologists have come about through culture contact, and therefore are subsumed under the diffusionist or acculturation models rather than the evolutionary model. But as Steward (1970: 2, 4) points out, such distinctions are "inadequate" since modernization, by whatever processes, "is evolutionary in that basic patterns and structures are qualitatively altered." Second, when anthropologists have analyzed the relation between religion and culture change, they have either focused on the reactionary character of the normative religion or they have studied deviant religions which turned out to be maladaptive, such as the Ghost Dance or various cargo cults. Finally, as long as missionaries were considered the unmitigated villians of anthropology, there could be little sympathy for any possible value to their social disruptions. Keesing (1976: 461) succinctly summarizes a widely held viewpoint:

    One of the many impediments to the success of fundamentalist Protestant missionaries has been the austerity and emptiness of the new life preferred in place of the old. A pall of Protestant gloom hangs over many a community in the Pacific and tropical South America that once throbbed with life, laughter and song.... Protestantism, as Weber (1956) and Tawney (1926) have compellingly argued, has historically been closely associated with the rise of capitalism, supported indirectly by the corporate wealth of Europe and the United States .... [Christianity] has been a direct instrument of imperialism to spread religion while gaining raw materials, markets and cheap labor.

On the positive side, general systems theory recognizes "the absolute necessity of deviationor more generally 'variety'--in providing a pool of potential transformations of process or structure that the adaptive system might adopt in responding to goal-mismatch" (Buckley, 1968: 495). Erich Fromm and Michael Maccoby (1970)--whose study will deserve further discussion later--have documented the role of the deviant individual in the process of culture change.

The Aymara Indians of the Lake Titicaca Basin in Peru provide a perfect setting for examining the manner in which religious deviation can provide that pool of variability essential to adaptation in a rapidly changing environment. A fifteen month study, employing participation-observation techniques plus an extensive questionnaire given by native leaders in three communities, clearly revealed that these people are presently undergoing a rapid and fundamental evolution from a subsistence agriculture economy to a money economy (1) which has affected virtually every aspect of their social system (Lewellen, 1978). In Soqa, the primary community of the study, a small Protestant elite has recently come into existence and assumed leadership in the process of change. In this paper, I have developed and tested hypotheses to explain this phenomenon, with the goal of understanding some of the processes by which a deviant religion can contribute to cultural evolution.

A PROTESTANT ELITE AMONG CATHOLIC AYMARA

Soqa, a community of 267 families, is situated on an island near the western shore of Lake Titicaca, connected to the mainland by a hundred-yard causeway that is knee-deep under water for about half of each year. Though exceptionally isolated, more than sixteen kilometers from the nearest town or highway, Soqa is typical of hundreds of peasant communities exploiting the relatively rich farm land around Lake Titicaca--at 3,800 meters (2,500 feet) the highest navigable lake in the world. Isolated both by physical barriers and by a rigid class structure, the Aymara have for centuries maintained a relatively closed social and economic system based on subsistence agriculture and animal husbandry. Largely self-sufficient, the people of Soqa have had minimal relations even with the larger regional campesino markets. However, within the last twenty or thirty years, the population, which has been growing slowly but exponentially for a century, exceeded available land to such an extent that few families could any longer be supported by agriculture alone, and many were forced to take wage labor jobs on the coast for several months each year. Exactly coincident with this sudden and severe economic change was the emergence of a small minority of Seventh Day Adventists as a power elite in the community.

There is little in the anthropological literature that would have predicted such a phenomenon. Protestants in Catholic societies have been portrayed as deviant individuals who were attracted to the new religion by capitalist greed, or by a personal inability to fit into the normative culture and who are frustrated and disillusioned from having to repudiate their own traditions and social networks (e.g., Carter, 1965). Recalling the quotation from Keesing, above, on the effects of Protestant missionization, we might well expect to find the Adventists on Soqa to be a disillusioned group of anomic marginals joylessly repudiating their heritage while lusting shamefully after Western goods.

The real picture is somewhat different. Adventists, and one Jehovah's Witness (born Adventist), comprise 18% of Soqa's population. This minority

      . . . holds the bulk of political power. Four of the top six political offices, including that of president, are held by Adventists, and they also hold 37% of all political positions;

      ... has more and considerably better schooling than Catholics (4.47 years for Adventist men, 3.05 for Catholic men);

      ... has an 18% larger per family money income (Adventist $633, Catholic $519; 1975 U.S. dollars translated from Peruvian soles);

      ... includes significantly (2) more men in the lucrative profession of musician (Adventist 15% of household heads, Catholic 4%);

      . . . includes a greater proportion of its temporary migrants to the coast who work in the longer-term, more profitable jobs in construction, mining and factory work (Adventist 40% of the migratory work force, Catholic 23%; the rest work as farm laborers);

      ... takes out seventeen times as many loans from the Banco Agropecuario to buy cattle to fatten and resell for a profit (Adventist 17% of households, Catholic 1%);

      ... has more corregated metal roofs--as opposed to thatch--per family housing complex (Adventist 1.54 roofs per family, Catholic 1.26);

      . . . has more possessions (on a list of eleven items, Adventists scored significantly higher on six and slightly higher on three).

When an extensive attitudinal questionnaire was given, Adventists

    ... showed significantly higher pro-education scores on all four questions designed to measure this factor;

    ... showed one slightly higher score and two significantly higher scores on questions designed to measure orientation to capitalism;

    ... chose education over profit on three questions which put these factors in conflict;

    . . . and, surprisingly, showed themselves as more traditional on some questions designed to measure this factor.

In sum, we find on Soqa not a group of greedy marginals suffering the pangs of anomie, but a relatively educated, slightly traditional elite which holds political and economic power out of proportion to its meager numbers. Why?

A "WEBERIAN" HYPOTHESIS

The relationship between Protestantism and capitalism has become such a commonplace since Max Weber's classic The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1956; orig. 1904) that it is simple reflex to hypothesize that this relation is the key to understanding the situation on Soqa. However, if we define "capitalism" in terms of free market or entrepreneurial enterprise, it is difficult to find any real difference between Catholic and Protestant among the Aymara. In Soqa, there is so little agricultural surplus that market sales are minimal for both groups. Adventists do purchase more cattle to fatten on lakeweed and sell for a profit, but virtually every family is involved in this enterprise and the difference between Catholic and Adventist is not significant. Yet if we narrowly define "capitalism" as the tendency to invest surplus back into the means of production, we may indeed find a difference. Catholic capital would seem to be drained away through the fiesta system, while Protestants are free to utilize their wealth productively.

We can thus state the hypothesis: People with a more capitalistic orientation, who want to escape the costs of the fiesta system in order to invest their money more productively, are attracted to Adventism, thus forming an economic elite.

To validate the hypothesis, it would be necessary to show (1) that the fiesta system actually does drain significant amounts of capital from the community; (2) that the Adventists invest significantly more in money-making activities; and (3) that the financial motive is a strong one for people converting to Adventism.

All of these were tested; none of them is true.

First, the fiesta system simply does not cost that much. There is no cargo system, no hierarchy of offices, and sponsors are appointed on a rigid, no-refusal rotation basis; no one is ever chosen as sponsor for a major fiesta more than once every five to eight years. Since one serves but a single day of a major fiesta, costs for 1975 to mid-1976 averaged only $157 for the largest fiesta, $40 for the second largest, and a mere $23 for the third largest. As the family income for Soqa Catholics is $519 per year, of which about $280 enters the community (the rest is spent on the coast), it is obvious that the fiesta system, as practiced in Soqa, is not tying up a great deal of capital. Second, virtually the only money investment in production is in purchasing cattle to fatten and resell, and, as we have seen, the difference--1.28 to 1.22 bulls per year--is not significant. Finally, of the five Adventist converts interviewed about their motives for converting, the only one with even a remotely economic motive was a poor Catholic who "married up" to a wealthier Adventist girl and accepted her religion as part of the marriage deal.

A closer examination of the statistics on Adventists and Catholics in Soqa reveals that differences in wealth and investment are real, but relatively small. The truly large difference--one measured both in average attained grade level and in attitudes--is in the area of education. It is here that we must seek our alternative hypothesis.

EDUCATION AND ADAPTIVE SELECTION

An alternative hypothesis, based on an evolutionary model, might be: In offering educational opportunities not otherwise available, Adventism has attracted a group of people more intelligent, progressive and independent than the norm. Though the values and skills promoted by the new religion are dysfunctional or irrelevant to a socioeconomic system based on subsistence agriculture, they have become essential as Soga enters the money economy.

Fortunately, we have a fairly complete history of the founding of the Adventist church in the Titicaca area in the writings of F. A. Stahl (1920) and J. B. A. Kessler, Jr. (1967). The particular history of Adventism on Soqa was gathered through interviews.

At the turn of the century, a young man named Manuel Ziniga Comacho was sent by his parents from his home in Plateria to work the nitrate mines in Chile. While there, Zuniga received some education in a Protestant school and, while remaining unconverted, became convinced that education was the answer to his people's oppression and poverty. Returning to Plateria, he attempted to found the first school for the Aymara but immediately came into conflict with the Catholic Church and with mestizos who held a strong vested interest in maintaining the status quo. The school was closed, under pressure, in 1907 after only three years of operation.

Believing that the presence of foreigners might restrain persecution, Zuniga journeyed to Ariquipa to ask the Adventist mission there for support. Though his trip was motivated by desire for education, not religion, he converted to Adventism as a condition of their support. In 1908 it was arranged that Frederick and Anna Stahl, missionaries recently appointed to Bolivia, would devote half their time to helping Zuniga. As the school showed signs of success, the Stahls came to devote full time to it, adding the first campesino health clinic in the area. Thus Adventism was essentially sold as a package deal--education, health, and religion, roughly in that order--and this resulted in the greatest Adventist success in South America.

In 1911, Frederick Stahl visited Soqa. invited by Pedro Cutipa, grandfather of the present president of the community and at that time cacique or headman of his group. After a time studying at the Plateria school, Pedro Cutipa returned to Soqa to start his own classes and eventually to found Adventism on the island. By 1916, there were five families on Soqa professing the new denomination.

Classes were taught in Spanish, for good reason: the avowed purpose of education was to permit individuals to read their Castillan Spanish Bibles. Soon Adventists were the only literate campesinos and about the only ones who spoke Spanish. However, such skills were useless to the tight, closed world of the Aymara and extremely threatening to those who lived by systematic oppression of the Indians. Persecution was ferocious.

In 1913, the Bishop of Puno marched with two hundred men on the Plateria mission, ransacking the buildings, beating and hauling off to jail the occupants, including Zuniga (the Stahls were away). In other incidents, Adventists were beaten at random, and death threats were common. Since Adventists were not permitted by their religion to drink alcohol, a favorite fiesta sport was to capture Adventists and pour liquor down their throats. Among the Quechua Indians to the north of the lake, persecution was even more violent, since campesino education threatened the hacienda system (the Aymara are mostly freeholders). A number of Adventist were killed and schools were burned to the ground.

Nevertheless, for more than forty years, until the early fifties, Adventism had a virtual monopoly on education in the area. By 1950, there were 166 Adventist schools in the southern Peruvian highlands. Yet there remained little practical value for education; peasant life was a dreary round of plantings and harvests. In such a culture, based on tradition and organized by kinship bonds, Adventism was not only deviant but also disruptive and dysfunctional.

However, massive change was already unavoidable. It is characteristic of a positive feedback system that it can remain stable for a long time then collapse all at once. Exponential population growth--in which the population doubles in increasingly shorter periods of time--is just such a system. Among the Titicaca Aymara, after perhaps a millenium of relative stability, the population severely overgrew its land base in a single generation.

On Soqa, one of the first direct responses to this situation was a complete change in the system of government. Traditional ayllus were loosely structured kin groups that formed the political and social basis for the Aymara system. These were so tenuously structured--Soqa had three ayllus which bled off onto the mainland in all directions--that they could only be held together by innumerable fiestas. With a diminution in land per family, these fiestas could no longer be supported. In 1952, Soqa assumed a community-style government based on a national model. This, for the first time, provided direct links to district, department, and national government agencies. It also secularized government, allowing Protestants to come to power.

And come to power they did. The closed system based on subsistence agriculture had broken wide-open almost overnight. Unable to support themselves on their land, men were forced to seek outside wage labor; today 74% of Soqa men work at least several months of every year on the coast, mainly in rice fields, but also in construction, mines, and factories. With entrance into the money economy came vastly increased contacts with mestizos, markets, and government agencies. Today, Soqa has a large public school and is building a clinic which, when completed, will be periodically staffed by government nurses.

On Soqa, only the Adventists were prepared for this rapid transition. They had a two- or even three-generation head start in the necessary skills of reading, writing, and speaking Spanish. Equally important, in fighting for their rights as far as Lima, Adventists had attained some sophistication in dealing with mestizos and with legal problems. Status used to be based on wealth; today it is based on the ability and willingness to mediate between the traditional Aymara community and the outside world. Adventists are the mediators.

DISCUSSION

The Aymara case is hardly unique; throughout history, small and deviant religious sects have, after a period of intense persecution, prospered and ultimately established new social norms. The problem is to view such development in an evolutionary perspective, to relate it to economic and social forces that might, originally, be quite independent of religion.

Adventists were not the cause of change on Soqa. Rather they were the preadaptive group selected by natural evolutionary processes to guide the community through a rapid transition. While this transition is taking place at different rates throughout the Titicaca Basin, my data for two other communities suggests that those communities lacking an educated minority may be more dilatory in making the necessary adaptations and much more chaotic in the process.3 Few communities had such an early, rapid, and smooth transition from ayllu to community government as Soqa, and few have developed such extensive ties with the outside world. (It may not be purely coincidental that the area's one native Aymara Catholic priest, the assistant to the Bishop of Juli, was an Adventist born on Soqa.) No other community I know of has such ambitions: under the strong leadership of an Adventist presidente (mayor), Soqa is striving to attain the legal status of villa, which requires long-term planning and the construction of a plaza with shops, a high school, a clinic, and a town hall. Only the latter has been completed so far, at enormous expense in both money and community labor. Such ambitions, deriving directly from the Adventist leadership, go far beyond the minimal changes necessary for community survival.

Fromm and Maccoby (1970) view deviant personality as the "central principle" in the process of change:

    In a relatively stable society (or class) with its typical social character, there will always be deviant characters or even misfits under the traditional conditions. However, in the process of socioeconomic change, new economic trends develop for which the traditional character is not well adapted, while a certain heretofore deviant character type can make optimal use of the new conditions. (p. 232)

The Aymara data do not refute, but neither do they support, such an emphasis on individual deviance. Pedro Cutipa was hardly a "deviant character," certainly not a "misfit" (indeed, he was leader of his ayllu) before he converted to Adventism. His "deviance" was perhaps only a special intelligence and readiness to try something new. Cutipa and his followers (and ultimately their progeny) were deviant not in terms of personality characteristics but in terms of the religion to which they belonged. The readiness with which these people moved from their position of ostracism into the mainstream of community life suggests that, individually, they had always been more or less in the mainstream. It was institutional ideology and values that set them apart, not personality.

This analysis poses no threat to materialist theories of cultural evolution, since the primary cause of change was population growth on a fixed land base. Once change became necessary, it was naturally funnelled into the industrial culture that forms the outer environment of the Aymara peasant system. However, the data do suggest that strict materialist theories may be too limited, that ideological and structural variations may play a very important role in determining whether the necessary adaptation will indeed take place, the manner in which it will take place, and the ease or difficulty with which it will take place.

Finally, we must consider the primacy of religion as a motive, an idea which will be anathema to many anthropologists who view all human motives and strategies in terms of perceived material rewards. What were the rewards perceived by Pedro Cutipa, who traded a headmanship for ostracism and persecution at a time when his new religion had little or no adaptive value--in fact was violently maladaptive? What we have been lacking in anthropology is recognition of the tremendous power of an idea--of education, of a new view of God or man. In emphasizing material causes and economic motives, theorists of cultural evolution may be ignoring one of the most powerful forces in the transformation of society.

NOTES

1. I do not mean to imply that previously the Aymara were not acquainted with the use of money; rather, such use was minimal or incidental, whereas today money plays a significant role in survival alongside agriculture. An economic formalist would probably use the term "market economy" where I use "money economy." However, I find this former term extremely confusing in relation to peasants, as one immediately thinks of sales in regional markets, rather than national markets, including the labor market. Regional markets played only a minor role in the economic transition of Soqa, since the community has little agricultural surplus to sell in such markets.

2. "Significance" in all cases was determined by the chi square test at .05 level.

3. I do not mean to imply that Adventism is the only factor in the rate and smoothness of the transition. Other factors include availability of arable land and of lake weed (to feed cattle)--both of which have a significant effect on the rapidity with which the transition must be made--and distance from market centers, i.e., closer communities have more options in entering the money economy, such as tourist crafts, and are often more progressive than more remote communities.

REFERENCES

Ashby, Ross W. 1968 "Variety, constraint, and the law of requisite variety." In Walter Buckley (Ed.), Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, 129-136. Chicago: Aldine.

Boehm, Christopher 1978 "Rational preselection from Hamadryas to Homo Sapiens: The place of decisions in adaptive process." American Anthropologist 80: 265-296

Buckley, Walter 1968 "Society as a complex adaptive system." In Walter Buckley (Ed.), Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, 490-513. Chicago: Aldine.

Carter, W. E. 1965 "Innovation and marginality: Two South American case studies." America Indigina 25: 383-398.

Fromm, Erich and Michael Maccoby 1970 Social Character in a Mexican Village: A Sociopsychoanalytic Study. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.

Gluckman, Max 1956 Custom and Conflict in Africa. New York: Barnes and Noble.

Kessler, J. B. A., Jr. 1967 A study of the Older Protestant Missions in Peru and Chile. Goes, Netherlands: Oosterbaan and le Cointre.

Lewellen, Ted 1978 Peasants in Transition: The Changing Economy of the Peruvian Aymara, a General System's Approach. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

Simpson, George Gaylord 1971 The Meaning of Evolution (Revised ed.). New York: Bantam.

Stahl, F. A. 1920 En el pais de los Incas. Puno, Peru: privately printed.

Steward, Julian 1970 Contemporary Change in Traditional Societies, Vol. 1. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.

Steward, Julian 1970 Theory of Culture Change: The Methodology of Multilinear Evolution. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.

Tawney, R. H. 1926 Religion and the Rise of Capitalism. London: John Murray.

Weber, Max 1956 The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Charles Scribners and Sons.

White, Leslie A. 1959 The Evolution of Culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Bibliografía